Interesting UK case on a Mother's right to Maternity leave and pay even if her child is born through surrogacy.

Woman who had a baby using a surrogate claims her human rights have been breached because she has not been allowed to have maternity pay

  • ‘I am just like any other parent of a newborn and my son and his needs are the same as any other baby’

By Daily Mail Reporter
PUBLISHED: 08:19 EST, 23 September 2012 | UPDATED: 02:27 EST, 24 September 2012
 

Care: A mother is taking the Government to court to win the right to receive maternity pay. File pictureCare: A mother is taking the Government to court to win the right to receive maternity pay. File picture

A woman is fighting for the right to get maternity pay despite having a baby using a surrogate mother.
She is taking Iain Duncan Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary, to the High Court claiming her human rights are being breached.
The woman, from Kent, says that even though she did not give birth to her son she is entitled to paid leave to look after and bond with him.
She told the Sunday Times: ‘Having my son via surrogacy does not change the fact that I want to and need to be there to care for him and bond with him in the early months of his life.
‘I am just like any other parent of a newborn and my son and his needs are the same as any other baby.’
The mother, to be named as RKA in court documents, says she ‘feels judged’ for her inability to have a child naturally.
Her case  is being brought at the same time as a legal challenge from Surrogacy UK which wants a judicial review of regulations barring maternity pay to mothers who use surrogates.
There are now about 140 surrogate births every year and the numbers are rising.
Currently, surrogates are paid a maternity allowance and given leave while in adoption cases, the birth and legal mothers are guaranteed pay up to 39 weeks and can take 52 weeks leave.
In the case of RKA , a medical problem meant she could not carry a baby, so the couple had IVF treatment and then embryos were implanted in a surrogate in September last year.
Her company reportedly said it was not legally required to give her paid leave or time off, when she asked about her benefits. They offered her 52 weeks unpaid leave.

Justice: The woman's case will be held at the High Court Justice: The woman’s case will be held at the High Court

In May, she contacted her employers about coming back to work, but was made redundant two months later.

She missed out on payment protection because her unpaid leave did not count in the same way as maternity and adoption leave.
RKA’s lawyer Merry Varney told the Sunday Times: ‘We hope that through bringing these cases parents of children born via surrogacy can be considered equal to those fortunate to have a family through natural birth.’

Go back

Surrogacy Blog

Load More →

My Surrogate Has Gestational Diabetes, What Does That Mean?

We often hear from Intended Parents that they are worried about their Surrogate having gestational diabetes. That’s why we chose to answer some of our most frequently asked questions about gestational diabetes and what it means if your Surrogate has…

Lern more →

Surrogacy and Breast Milk

Did you know that your surrogacy journey doesn’t have to end once you deliver? Many Gestational Surrogates choose to continue their journey by pumping breast milk for their Intended Parents, other new parents, hospitals, or milk banks! Want to learn…

Lern more →

Questions To Ask Before Beginning Your Surrogacy Journey

Congratulations on the decision to grow your family with help from Simple Surrogacy! Surrogacy is a big decision with many components involved. That’s why we decided to showcase some important questions to ask before beginning your surrogacy journey! Keep reading…

Lern more →

Login as a Surrogate

Login as an Intended Parent

Login as a Donor

Donations - Login as an Intended Parent