In the deeply personal and emotionally charged journey of building a family through surrogacy, one question should stand above all else: Is this ethical? Unfortunately, as commercial surrogacy grows globally, that question is being sidestepped far too often by hopeful intended parents chasing lower costs in developing countries. It’s time to face a hard truth: pursuing surrogacy in nations like Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, or Greece often strays into murky, exploitative territory that threatens the rights, health, and dignity of vulnerable women.
If you’re considering an international surrogacy outside of the U.S. or Canada, particularly in a developing country, you owe it to yourself—and more importantly, to the woman who might carry your child—to take a long, hard look at the ethical implications. The allure of “cheaper” surrogacy options is not just financially motivated—it often masks a disturbing willingness to exploit economic disparity for personal gain.
Surrogacy costs in developing countries are significantly lower than in the U.S. or Canada, often as little as $50,000 to $70,000 compared to upwards of $200,000 in North America. That savings is undeniably appealing, particularly for couples who’ve already spent tens of thousands on fertility treatments. But here’s the truth that cost-cutting parents don’t like to admit: someone else is paying that price, and it’s usually the surrogate herself.
Many of these women are not freely choosing surrogacy from a place of empowerment. Instead, they are pressured—either implicitly or explicitly—by poverty, relatives, or husbands. In countries like Mexico, Colombia, and India, traditional gender roles and economic hardship collide to create situations where a woman’s body becomes her family’s survival strategy. This is not choice. This is coercion masquerading as opportunity.
In the West, we expect a surrogate to have access to psychological counseling, legal guidance, and the right to choose her path without undue influence. In countries with weaker legal systems and patriarchal social structures, those expectations vanish. It’s alarmingly common for surrogates to be selected or offered up by their families, sometimes even without fully understanding the medical procedures or the emotional toll of carrying and relinquishing a child.
The fact that many surrogates in these countries don’t sign clear contracts is chilling. In some cases, verbal agreements or hastily written documents substitute for the rigorous legal vetting that is standard in the U.S. or Canada. What happens when there’s a medical emergency? A dispute over parentage? A disagreement about selective reduction or termination?
The legal ambiguity means that the surrogate, the child, and the intended parents are all at risk. But let’s be clear—the person with the least power and the most to lose is the surrogate.
These three Latin American countries have recently emerged as new “hotspots” for commercial surrogacy, especially as India and Thailand began to restrict international access due to widespread ethical concerns. But these nations are poorly equipped to deal with the demands and complexities of international surrogacy.
Although some Mexican states have legalized surrogacy, the legal framework is fragmented, vague, and constantly shifting. Laws can vary wildly by state, and many operate in a legal gray zone. That leaves surrogates and intended parents in dangerous territory—there’s little protection if something goes wrong.
More disturbingly, investigations have revealed that in some Mexican clinics, surrogates are kept in group homes, monitored and restricted in their movement and contact with others. They are often isolated from their families for months, told what to eat, when to rest, and what to do with their bodies.
Colombia has no comprehensive surrogacy legislation, meaning contracts are not legally binding and enforcement is uncertain at best. Surrogacy clinics are popping up to meet foreign demand, operating with little oversight and a chilling disregard for the women involved.
With a long history of internal conflict and economic disparity, Colombia is hardly in a position to offer legal protections to gestational carriers. Women in desperate circumstances are recruited with promises of payments they may never see in full. Do we really want to build families on the backs of exploited women who don’t even have legal recourse if they’re mistreated?
Though seen as a more progressive nation in some areas of reproductive rights, Argentina has no clear laws governing surrogacy. As demand from international clients increases, the country is seeing a growing number of informal surrogacy arrangements that operate in legal limbo.
When surrogacy is unregulated, the risk of human rights abuses skyrockets. Medical care is often insufficient, informed consent is murky, and legal parentage can be difficult to establish. The lack of legal clarity puts everyone at risk—especially the surrogate.
India once served as the epicenter of international commercial surrogacy. For years, hopeful parents flocked to Indian clinics lured by low prices and the promise of quick results. But the dark side soon emerged: women recruited from poor villages, housed in dormitories, pressured into repeated pregnancies, and often abandoned without proper medical care once their service was rendered.
In one high-profile case, 13 Vietnamese women, some pregnant, were trafficked into Thailand for the purpose of surrogacy. Reports from the World Health Organization and various human rights groups raised red flags about surrogacy rings that resembled modern-day slavery more than healthcare.
Even when legal contracts existed, they were often unclear, unenforceable, or written in English—a language many surrogates couldn’t read. Some women had to be reminded that the baby wasn’t theirs, which is perhaps the most heartbreaking indication of just how poorly understood the process is for many of these carriers.
At what point does surrogacy cross the line into baby-selling? When the surrogate receives none of the compensation directly, has little understanding of her rights, and may not have full consent, it becomes disturbingly close. The act of giving birth becomes commodified. Her role reduced to that of a rented womb, with little to no dignity or agency.
Western couples who participate in these arrangements are not “just trying to build a family.” They are complicit in a system of exploitation that values savings over ethics. That’s the uncomfortable reality.
There are haunting parallels between the international surrogacy boom and the inter-country adoption scandals of the 1980s and 90s, where children were literally sold to Western families, sometimes abducted or misrepresented as orphans. The industry was eventually reined in through international conventions and government crackdowns.
Are we willing to wait until something similarly tragic happens again before we take action? Surrogacy without regulation is just adoption without safeguards.
Not every surrogacy journey involves exploitation. The U.S. and Canada offer a framework where ethics, transparency, and human rights come first. In these countries:
Agencies in North America work with surrogates who choose this path with full understanding and consent. They are educated, supported, and protected. And while the price tag may be higher, it ensures the process honors everyone involved.
Every family deserves the chance to grow. But no child’s journey should begin with injustice. Surrogacy is not a transaction—it’s a profound relationship built on trust, transparency, and care. If you’re choosing to create life, do so in a way that uplifts and honors the woman helping you achieve that dream—not by exploiting her desperation.
If you’re seriously considering international surrogacy in a developing country because it’s cheaper, ask yourself:
If you can’t answer yes to all of these questions, you shouldn’t be pursuing this path.
We understand the pain of infertility. We understand the desire to build a family. But your surrogacy journey should reflect your values, not your budget. Choosing to exploit women in economically disadvantaged nations is not only unethical—it’s unconscionable.
Ethical surrogacy is possible. It exists in the U.S. and Canada. It’s guided by law, compassion, and mutual respect. It may cost more, but the price is worth it—because it comes without the stain of exploitation, coercion, or ambiguity.
To those who have considered a low-cost international surrogacy: Think again. This is not just a financial decision. It is a human one. And the world is watching.
Go back
Surrogacy 101: One Surrogate’s Birth Story – A Journey of Heart, Hope, and Happiness This article continues our series on informational articles about surrogacy, told through the heartfelt and inspiring story of Melissa J., a first-time Surrogate through Simple Surrogacy.…
Lern more →Surrogacy 101: Choose Your Agency Why Simple Surrogacy Should Be Your First Step Toward Parenthood Beginning the journey of surrogacy is a deeply personal and life-changing decision. Whether you’re a hopeful parent who has tried every avenue to conceive or…
Lern more →If you have had a hysterectomy, you might wonder: Can you have a surrogate after a hysterectomy? The good news is that you can become a parent through surrogacy after a hysterectomy, even if you no longer have a uterus.…
Lern more →
